Love the health report. You could also take a look at the Seagate Exos or WD Ultrastar harddisks. After purchasing a WD 4TB Red EFAX drive like the one that Servethehome tested, we used our existing test rig with eight Seagate Ironwolf drives … How was it? I recently had a 4TB IronWolf totally die within a few weeks of commisioning, and it was replaced by the store. The higher end SATA DAS/NAS storage segments have been served by 4 TB … What about RMA process in Europe for either company? I’ve always liked to follow the reviews that large data centers publish on the results they’ve seen on hard drives and their reliability. Here's a comparison of the IronWolf's noise level with its 7200 RPM counterpart, the 4TB IronWolf Pro (Detailed spec sheets linked in product name): Seagate Technology | Official Forums Team. I second this, though I'm not in Europe. Thanks. It was relatively painless. I had a drive fail on me a month after the warranty expired and they made an exception for me without any fuss. Planning to buy one of these models. Same here, checked also the reports of the last years and always Seagate stood out negatively with their drive failures. Most importantly, it costs significantly less, just around 15 cents … I want to buy 2x 4TB drives at the beginning and add more if i need more storage. UserBenchmark USA-User . Our next test shifts focus from a pure 8k sequential 100% read/write scenario to a mixed 8k 70/30 workload, where we will show how performance scales in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q. Product Comparison: Western Digital Red Pro vs Seagate IronWolf Pro. At the moment I prefer the Ironwolf drives because of the lower price and better speed. They are a bit noisier and slightly more power hungry though, but it depends on your use case whether that's an issue or not. The Pro Reds have a rotation speed of 7200 RPM unlike their regular Red counterparts which are marketed as "IntelliPower" but actually spin at fixed speeds of 5400 or … Screaming kids half a mile away will become far more annoying in a close to silent room. We had two main areas of testing. IME IronWolf 4TB drives run cooler than older WD Red 3TB drives. In de tabel zien je de meest relevante specificaties, … CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS ... 1TB 2TB 3TB 4TB 8TB 10TB 12TB. Seagate IronWolf 4TB NAS Internal Hard Drive HDD. The IronWolf family of NAS hard drives come in 1TB, 2TB, 3TB, 4TB, 6TB, 8TB, 10TB, 12TB, 14TB, and 16TB versions and with three-year warranties. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. A quiet conversation at home will be in the 50-55dBA range. The WD always seem to run cooler than the ironwolf. Both would probably be acceptable to me, given the same cost and that Ironwolfs have slightly better performance along with the "gimmicky" Ironwolf Health support to … Are the Ironwolf HDD comparable to the WD Red in terms of quality/reliability? Whichever drive you choose, it'll be pretty damn quiet. Subjectively, the latter is very noticeable from 5m at night (rig is in my living room/bedroom). Product Comparison: Seagate IronWolf vs Western Digital Red. The Toshiba X300 series is not marketed as a NAS drive but the feedback is generally good and 6TB pricing is 20% less than the WD/ Seagate NAS variants. Anyone dealt with either WD or Seagate RMA process or both in Europe? The WD40EFAX is the only SMR drive in the comparison and is the focus of the testing. If I choose Ironwolf models I would choose the normale non-pro models because I don't need the pro features. I have both in my DS4512+, Ironwolf runs cooler (-2 or -3° compared to WD), noise at idle or low load is similar, writes could be a little bit louder on Ironwolf since I added the disk to the array, but it's very subjective. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Also remember that as you lower your noise floor, everything seems to become louder. In contrast to that, I never had a problem with WD or HGST drives yet. 4.6 ... Seagate IronWolf 4TB NAS Internal Hard Drive HDD – CMR 3.5 Inch SATA 6Gb/s 5900 RPM 64MB Cache for RAID Network Attached Storage – Frustration Free Packaging (ST4000VN008) 4.7 out of 5 stars 8,021. I had pretty bad experience with them in the past and when I bought my NAS and looked for drives, I noticed them being still bad, as even new drives on amazon had bad sectors or after a few weeks/months. WD Red SA500 Review: 4TB of SSD Storage for Your NAS Big bulky SSDs are headed to a NAS near you By Sean Webster 27 January 2020. A ticking clock will be in the 20-30dBA range. The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf … WD’s Red SA500 NAS SSD is a direct response to Seagate’s IronWolf 110, but with its lower cost-per-GB, it is a much better value for those who don’t need extreme write endurance. Currently I use old lying around drives. Planning to buy one of these models. Also if it’s in your NAS enclosure you won’t notice it that much. You won't be able to hear them over the fans or power supply in your rig, most likely. Seagate RMA rocks. there is no doubt, that RED vs IronWolf lines have similar basic performance specification (Max. Sustained Transfer Rate) when IronWolf has 7200 rpm of spindle speed as standard from 6TB capacity, entire WD Red line has 5400 rpm only both Pro series have … MSI WS65 9TL-686 15.6 inch Intel Core i7-9750H 2.6GHz/ 32GB DDR4/ 512GB NVMe SSD/ Quadro RTX 4000/ USB3.1/ Windows 10 Pro Ultrabook (Matte Black with Gold Diamond cut) Both would probably be acceptable to me, given the same cost and that Ironwolfs have slightly better performance along with the "gimmicky" Ironwolf Health support to compensate for their noise. Your comparisons make total sense. Funny for every person that says this there is a person that has the opposite issue, I've had 8 of 16 Seagates drives fail in a RS4017. WD RE 4TB and WD Red 4TB Thermal Imaging. This is also subjective but you will see people that have had 0 failures but that is not the case for me. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. Regarding your constraints, Ironwolf has very similar noise signature and better reliability reputation (no marketing mess with SMR, RPM, running cooler, IronWolf Health Checks which are enhanced S.M.A.R.T. Main requirement is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe. Western Digital achieved parity with the launch of the second generation WD Red models yesterday. Like I already replied to the other comment: I'd go with Iron Wolfs but buy one from two different companies that way you are more likely to get different batches. First off, thanks for considering Seagate, regardless of which route you decide to go in the end. Is it really better to use both? WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. Contains all products handled automatically. This financing payment is based on a lease transaction. Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD Red Plus 4TB. IronWolf drives >= 8TB are 7200rpm. One more data point, my gaming rig has 7 Noctua fans from 12 to 20 cm plus two on the CPU cooler. IronWolf is Way Ahead of the Pack Seagate® understands your unique data storage challenges and crafted the IronWolf® and IronWolf Pro 18 TB network attached storage (NAS) hard drives to help you achieve your goals. I would not worry about the noise, at all. So you need a PC and a 3.5 enclosure. checks, etc). Like everyone else has said though, the drives are unlikely to be the thing you notice. Out of the 10 or so WD Red disks I have had over the years I have only had to RMA one. But I don't know which drives I should use, WD Red or Seagate Ironwolf. The Iron wolfs are technically a trivial amount faster as well, but just like with the noise, not enough that you will notice. This ensures a lower power consumption and a good error correction. $250. The same thing has happened with WD Reds. Based on my research, these 4TB WD Reds are quieter. Always best to mix and match, at least different manufacturuing runs. Testing the WD Red 4TB SMR WD40EFAX Drive. I currently have a bunch of 4TB Ironwolfs, and a variety of WD drives. Van boven naar beneden de WD Red 4TB, de Seagate Ironwolf 4TB, de Toshiba N300 4TB, de WD Red Pro 4TB en de toepasselijk naamgegeven HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB. You're probably not going to be able to hear a difference. 14tb Seagate ironwolf $525 (Logan Square) pic hide this posting restore restore this posting. 38 dB in idle mode, 45 dB with all fans running at 1500 rpm. Do note that only configurations of 4TB … Deze schijven nemen het tegen elkaar op. Are the Red or Ironwolf drives more quite? Hey OP. Die Festplatten mit 1TB bis 4TB haben einen Cache von 64MB, die Festplatten mit 6TB bis 14TB Speicher haben einen Cache von 256MB. We continue to push capacity boundaries way ahead of our competition. $375. In reads, the IronWolf was just behind the Seagate Enterprise (8TB) for second place with 647 IOPS. I recommend whichever is on the better sale that week. Consider their 2019 report: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-hard-drive-stats-q1-2019/. However the Ironwolfs are much more reliable, still haven't had one die on me. I recently made the switch to SG Ironwolf and as long as it works out will never buy a Red again. I currently have a bunch of 4TB Ironwolfs, and a variety of WD drives. Skip the lowest cost drives such as the WD Green/ Blue series. Thanks for the details. Can you say me how many died in the last 2-3 years?I need to say that I don't really care about the disk from before 5 to 20 years ago because every manufacturer update & optimate their drives. I've been running 6x4TB IronWolfs for 8 months now, they are running cool and I've had no issues in ambient 35c temps in a 1618+. According to WD website only the Red pro drives have 5 year warranty, the normal non-pro have 3 year warranty. Spend your time and money on super quiet fans and a well sound insulated case with isolated fan and HDD mounts if the small amounts of noise matters that much to you. ; Die WD Red ist mit einem Speicher von 1TB bis 10TB erhältlich. A typical library is ~40dBA ambient noise. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. favorite this post Nov 17 Once they have analysed it they swap out the disks. Yes but the tool is only running on Windows. And so, as you can imagine, Backblaze goes through a lot of hard drives. Ironwolf Datasheet: https://www.seagate.com/www-content/datasheets/pdfs/ironwolf-14tb-DS1904-10-1807US-en_US.pdf (Page 3), Red Datasheet: https://www.wdc.com/content/dam/wdc/website/downloadable_assets/eng/spec_data_sheet/2879-800002.pdf (Page 3). Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-hard-drive-stats-q1-2019/. Both things should not be required as a NAS owner. Go figure. I thought the system would me more stable if the drives are the same type. What is your experience with the 4TB drives? So according to the specs you posted, the Red is twice as loud as the Seagate. Based on my research, these 4TB WD Reds are quieter. Seems they really don't use WD so this is useless to compare the two top brands. These are generally faster and more reliable and come with a 5 year warranty. Of course everyone makes different experiences, but my personal experience over the years was that if your data is not valuable to you, you use Seagate. The new 4TB WD Red Pro is an upgraded version of WD's popular Red NAS (Network Attached Storage). Schreibend sind fast 700 MB/s möglich, hier hat ein RAID 5 aber auch einen Vorteil gegenüber dem anderen RAID 6 Verbund, da die Dateien auf weniger Festplatten aufgeteilt werden müssen. Main requirement is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe. +3dB is a doubling of the loudness. My experience has been the opposite. The Iron wolfs are technically a trivial amount faster as well, but just like with the noise, not enough that you will notice. One of the contributors to the different things you're hearing on IronWolf sound levels could be that larger capacities (6TB+) IronWolf models are 7200 RPM, and as a result, they're louder. I found their noise levels to be the same. I bought the Exos versions myself - the warranty is longer and the cost is pretty similar. However, the 4TB (and lower capacities) model is 5900 RPM. Our Verdict. You want drives that have successfully been used in these types of applications. Personally I'm running WD reds and I still don't trust Seagate yet so will be sticking with WD/HGST in the future. Oodles of storage for the network. I know that the noise difference is very minimal, but I just was irritated because the datasheets shows that Ironwolf drives are more quite than red drives but that doesn't match the public posts about the noise level. A couple of dB lower in seek isn't going to stop you hearing the seek. Advertiser Disclosure. I'd look instead at GB/$$$. But I always reed that the Red ones are more quite. You will notice very little difference unless you have a very specific use case which depends on the exact nature of the drive. Currently I run with 6x 6TB WD Red's, 7x 3TB WD Red's and just built another NAS for a friend with 5x 4TB Seagate IronWolf's. favorite this post Nov 17 ... WD Red 4TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 5400 RPM Class SATA 6Gb/s 64MB Cache $90 (little village) hide this posting restore restore this posting. A bit of fan noise isn't a bad background noise to have. IronWolfs. I've owned both. Whatever you go for, at the very least buy drives from more than one supplier to reduce the chance of getting two drives made at the same time from the same manufacturing batch. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. I wouldn't worry about the noise, as both of those are nearly silent. Western Digital 4TB WD Red Plus NAS Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 64 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD40EFRX Seagate BarraCuda 4TB Internal Hard Drive HDD – 3.5 Inch Sata 6 Gb/s 5400 RPM 256MB Cache For Computer Desktop PC – Frustration Free Packaging ST4000DMZ04/DM004 MTBF is considerably higher for these series. I don’t have an opinion on the noise levels. Thanks, for your view. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. I have now owned both and I have purchased more replacement drives due to bad sectors than I care to admit...from WD. I did not hear a difference (I do have 1 IW to 4 other Reds. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Press J to jump to the feed. The 4TB … And they run significantly hotter than 5200/5900rpm drives. Best drives I ever owned where HGST 4TB in particular, https://www.google.com/search?q=wd+red+shingled, https://www.anandtech.com/show/15878/western-digital-cleans-up-the-red-smr-nas-hdd-mess, https://www.servethehome.com/wd-red-smr-vs-cmr-tested-avoid-red-smr/. Bei der Ironwolf bietet Seagate 1TB bis 14TB Speicherkapazität. Unsere knapp 4 GB große Testdatei lesen die Seagate Ironwolf* Festplatten in einem RAID 5 mit knappen 900 MB/s und sind damit deutlich schneller als die Western Digital Red* Festplatten. Die Festplatten mit einer Kapazität von 1TB bis 6TB haben ein Cache von 64MB, die Festplatte mit 8TB Speicher bietet beim Cache 128MB. ... Western Digital Red Pro 6TB... WD Red Pro … You will notice very little difference unless you have a very specific use case which depends on the exact nature of the drive. Though slower in writes, the WD Red and Seagate IronWolf posted better read performance: 202,292 IOPS and 200,459 IOPS (iSCSI), respectively. Specifications. X. The 'problem' is now, that the Ironwolf datasheet says its more quite (2.3bels <=> 23dBA Idle and 2.5bels <=> 25dBA Seek) than the Red(25dBA Idle and 26dBA Seek) ones. The Used 2008 CASE 1650L XLT is offered at CAD $129,000.00. Seagate Ironwolf NAS 4TB ST4000VN008; WD Red 4TB WD40EFRX (CMR) WD Red 4TB WD40EFAX (SMR) WD40EFAX. X. i plan to upgrade my test/tmp (unRAID) NAS to a 'productive' system with new drives. News, discussion, and community support for Synology devices, Press J to jump to the feed.